

Some have called the car ‘too safe’, a case accentuating the incompatibility between humans and machines. However, cars typically failed to come to a complete stop, immobilizing the Google vehicle. For instance, in 2009, the car was not able to make it through a four-way stop, as its sensors waited for other cars to stop completely before let it go through the intersection. Human error on the road is tough to deal with when the car has been programmed to be a stickler for the rules. In 2015, Google’s driverless car ran into a surprising safety predicament, humans. Issues during test runs of these vehicles have drawn attention to the need for self-correction mechanisms. This is roughly equivalent to fast forwarding technology roughly 7 years into the future or Moore’s law by three generations.įurther, we find ourselves in the age of self-driving cars. For instance, just last week, Google opened up about its Tenor Processing Unit (or TPU), the server chip they use in-house to perform AI computing workloads more efficiently advancing machine-learning capability by the power of three generations. are the forerunners of a cyber revolution marked by rapid technological growth. It’s reputation as one of the biggest fashion events was maintained by those in attendance.Technological giants such as Amazon, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, etc. The theme resulted in many beautiful Catholic inspired dresses, and it was surprising to see how a majority of the A-list celebrities stuck to the theme of the event.

“I think the Met Gala has over the top, crazy weird clothes most of the time, but it didn’t really stick to that as much this year,” Isabella Anderson described. This year, the fashion of the Met Gala were far more understated than ever before. She was beautiful, but the little things in her look were what went wrong with it. To add on, Gomez had obviously received a spray tan, but ended up looking more like she had used a little bit of peanut butter for foundation. The dress, though beautiful, didn’t do much to flatter Gomez’s figure. The theory behind Selena Gomez’s look was there, but the execution was where the ensemble fell short. The look would’ve been far more beautiful had she worn smaller, more delicate wings. They aimed to make her appear angelic, but were so over the top that they were borderline trashy. Katy Perry’s 6 foot wings proved to be the centerpiece of her ensemble. To add on, he brought the gold certification of his song “Icon.” This look was simply subpar because it avoided the theme, and he seemed to draw focus away from the occasion. “Her look stood out, but not in an extremely over the top way.”Īlthough not a horrible look, Jaden Smith’s outfit was far from the theme, and didn’t suit the occasion. “I think Cardi B did a really good job in following the theme,” Seidy Trenary, junior, stated. Glowing in her pregnancy, Cardi B stepped out in a 30-lb dress by Jeremy Scott, alongside the designer himself. It was not as over the top as many of the Met Gala looks tend to be, but was elegant as well as following the theme. Stunning in a piece with stained-glass inspired detail, Gigi’s Versace dress wowed. Although seeming to play it safe compared to last year, she still proved to be one of the most striking at the event. Rihanna, known to take fashion risks in the past at this event, stepped out in a Pope inspired dress by Margiela.

However, once the night came around, almost all controversy was forgotten in favor of the magical haute couture on the red (actually creme) carpet. This years theme was “Heavenly Bodies: Fashion and the Catholic Imagination.” The topic was originally viewed as controversial, due to the possibility of fashion choices coming off as offensive to the religion. The prestigious event that serves to raise funds for the Metropolitan Museum of Art was home to many famous faces on Monday Night, May 7th.įashion is the focus of the ball, and each year, the Met Gala has a theme that the fashion should reflect. Blake Lively, a regular at the Met Gala, wowed in a burgundy colored dress.
